Workplace Express is a subscription-based news service. You must have a current subscription and be logged in to access this article:
A barrister's history of representing unions did not mean there could be a reasonable apprehension that he would be biased in arbitrating an industrial dispute between a demolition company and Victoria's Bracks Government, the State's Supreme Court has held.
If you are not a subscriber and would like to arrange a free trial or subscription, please click on one of the buttons below.